👻 HAUNTED PLACE · EXP. Nº9474 ACTIVE

Dragsholm Castle

Dragsholm Castle is a location reputed to be haunted in Zealand, DK. Its reputation comes from reported apparitions, unexplained phenomena and eyewitness accounts gathered over time.

Where is Dragsholm Castle?

Location
Zealand, DK
Type
Castle
Coordinates
55.772, 11.391
Testimonies
0
Last updated
LOCATION

Why is Dragsholm Castle said to be haunted?

Dragsholm Castle stands on the Odsherred coast of Zealand, built around 1215 as a bishop's house and rebuilt in baroque form after the Swedes blew part of it up around 1660. Between 1536 and 1664 it was a Danish state prison, and a note in a sixteenth-century Danish calendar puts James Hepburn, fourth Earl of Bothwell and third husband of Mary, Queen of Scots, inside its walls on 16 June 1573; the same source gives his death there on 14 April 1578. The pillar with a worn groove that guides show is not in the archives: the scholar who worked through them in 1863 found tradition pointing instead at two iron bars in a wall, and said even that was too recent to trust. The castle's best-known ghosts are den hvide dame, a nobleman's daughter said to have been walled up alive for loving a stable hand, and den grå dame, a housekeeper who disapproves of change; the phrase naming the first appears in the Danish press only from 1969. Dragsholm is now a Michelin-starred hotel that has stopped telling the stories entirely.
Dragsholm Castle, Zealand, Denmark
The whitewashed baroque front seen from the park. It dates from the rebuilding of 1694-97, more than a century after Bothwell died here in 1578. Image: Bococo · CC BY-SA 3.0

What is the history of Dragsholm Castle?

Dragsholm was a bishop's house before it was ever a prison or a hotel, and the castle's own timeline is careful to say only that it was "most likely built around 1215 as a palatium rather than a castle", with masonry details pointing to the workshop of Roskilde Cathedral. Popular accounts credit Bishop Peder Sunesen, but he died on 29 October 1214, and the castle's current history page no longer names him. Over the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries the palatium was walled into a four-winged fortress: thicker walls, smaller windows, a widened moat. It held out through a siege of several months during the Count's Feud in 1535 and passed to the Crown only with the Reformation of 1536. From 1536 to 1664 Dragsholm was a royal fief and a state prison for noblemen and clergy. Its most famous inmate arrived on a datable day. James Hepburn, fourth Earl of Bothwell and third husband of Mary, Queen of Scots, had been a Danish state prisoner since 1567, held at Copenhagen and then at Malmöhus in Scania under conditions loose enough that his contemporaries spoke of honourable confinement. At the end of May 1573 Edinburgh Castle, the last stronghold of Mary's party, surrendered; a fortnight later the French ambassador Charles de Dancay reported from Copenhagen, on 28 June 1573, that Frederik II had suddenly moved Bothwell to "un fort mauluaise et estroite prison" — a very bad and narrow prison. Dancay did not name it. A Danish note does: in Eiler Brockenhuus's annotated copy of Paul Eber's Calendarium Historicum, under 16 June 1573, someone wrote "Anno 1573. Bleff den skotiske Greffue indseth paa Dragsholm" — in 1573 the Scottish Earl was put into Dragsholm. He was not the only Scot behind those walls. Captain John Clark, who had faced Bothwell across the field at Carberry Hill and whose imprisonment Bothwell himself had helped bring about, had been sent to Dragsholm in 1571 and died there; the same calendar records his death on 14 April 1575. Three years later, under 14 April 1578, it records Bothwell's. His coffin was carried to the nearest church, at Fårevejle, a few kilometres away across the water meadows. The castle did not survive the seventeenth century intact. During the Dano-Swedish wars the occupying troops blew up part of the structure around the peace of 1660, and a survey of 1662 reported the place utterly destroyed, walls only. Frederik Christian Adeler bought the ruin in 1694 and, with his wife Henriette Margrethe von Lente, had it rebuilt by 1697 in the baroque form still standing: whitewashed walls, hipped slate roofs, a symmetrical court. The estate was made a barony and renamed Adelersborg in 1785; Georg Frederik Otto Zytphen-Adeler, one of the promoters of the draining of Lammefjorden, restored the old name in 1868. The Adeler line ended in 1932 and Johan Frederik Bøttger bought castle and estate in 1937, since when it has been run as a hotel. The modern chapter is unusually well documented because the owner wrote it down himself. Mads Hylleholt Bøttger joined as director in 2005; the cellar was rebuilt in 2006 with a kitchen and gourmet restaurant, Claus Henriksen took over the stoves in 2008, a kitchen fire on 27 November 2014 spread through the ventilation and damaged roughly two thirds of the building, and the Michelin star arrived in February 2017. Dragsholm today has forty-one rooms, three restaurants and a place in Relais & Châteaux.

Timeline: the documented record of Dragsholm Castle

  1. c. 1215 Dragsholm is built, on the castle's own reading of the architectural evidence, as a palatium of the bishops of Roskilde rather than a fortress; the masonry is linked to the workshop of Roskilde Cathedral. Bishop Peder Sunesen, to whom popular accounts credit it, had died on 29 October 1214.
  2. 16 June 1573 A note in Eiler Brockenhuus's annotated copy of Paul Eber's Calendarium Historicum records that the Scottish Earl was put into Dragsholm. Two weeks after the fall of Edinburgh Castle, the French ambassador Charles de Dancay reported from Copenhagen on 28 June that Frederik II had moved Bothwell to a very bad and narrow prison, without naming it.
  3. 14 April 1578 The same Danish calendar gives day and year for Bothwell's death at Dragsholm. His coffin was taken to the nearest church, at Fårevejle. Under 14 April 1575 the calendar had already recorded the death there of another Scot, Captain John Clark, imprisoned at Dragsholm since 1571 and buried in the same church.
  4. 1582 George Buchanan, Bothwell's bitterest enemy, prints in his Rerum Scoticarum Historia that the earl died insane after about ten years — post decennium — of squalor. Melvil, Spottiswood, De Thou and Lord Herries repeat it; the Catholic apologist Robert Turner contested it in 1588 because he needed a lucid deathbed confession exonerating Mary.
  5. 1847 An illustrated survey of Danish manor houses records what tradition then pointed to in the cell called Bothwell's: not a pillar, but two iron bars in the wall to which his fetters were said to be fastened so that he could move round with them.
  6. 31 May 1858 The unmarked coffin at Fårevejle is opened to test the tradition. Schiern records that nothing positive was seen to show the corpse was Bothwell's, and answers the argument that the head looked Scottish by noting that Bothwell was not the only Scot buried in that church. The body was nonetheless exhibited as Bothwell's mummy.
  7. 7 November 1938 Patrick Ramsay, of the British legation in Copenhagen, writes for King George VI's household that an expert committee has re-examined the burial with X-rays and published in the Sunday supplement of Berlingske Tidende: the mummy is that of a bailiff, Chresten Pedersen Poder, who died in 1683, the crypt is some seventy-five years later than Bothwell, and the coffin fittings date from about 1700. Poul Nørlund of the National Museum concurred.
  8. 28 August 1969 Holbæk Amts Venstreblad prints the account of the White Lady that the Odsherred local-history wiki still cites as its source. It is also the first year in which the phrase den hvide dame paa Dragsholm appears anywhere in the digitised Danish press, against some fifteen hundred pages pairing Dragsholm with Bothwell since 1862.
  9. 18 October 1976 The glass lid over the body at Fårevejle is replaced by an oak one, ending more than a century of public display; the remains had been moved to the present crypt in 1949. In 2019 Museum Vestsjælland put small skin samples taken from the body on show at Asnæs shopping centre.
  10. 3 December 2018 Owner Mads Hylleholt Bøttger publishes a signed essay recalling that Dragsholm was known for ghost stories and bad food when he took over, and that the unimaginative ghost tales had to go. By 2026 the castle's own history pages, in Danish and English, contain no occurrence of ghost, haunted, White Lady, Grey Lady or Bothwell.

Is there a rational explanation for Dragsholm Castle?

Start with the two ladies, because the version this entry used to carry had them the wrong way round. In Danish they are den hvide dame and den grå dame, and the walling-up belongs to the white one. She is told as a nobleman's daughter — the tourist literature calls her Celestine Mariann de Bayonne Gyldenstierne and dates her disappearance to about 1550 — who was made pregnant by a stable hand and immured by her furious father. Gorm Benzon's collection of Danish castle legends tells the same scene with a Swedish officer instead of the stable hand and death by starvation in the south wing. The grey lady is nobody's prisoner: the guides name her Louise Katrine Jensdatter, a maid who stole from the household silver, was trained rather than dismissed by her mistress, ended as housekeeper in the sixteen-hundreds and now objects to changes and to portraits being rehung. Servant and noblewoman had been swapped, and a story about propriety had been turned into a story about masonry. Both ladies are late in print. In the digitised Danish newspaper corpus at the Royal Danish Library, the phrase "den hvide dame paa Dragsholm" does not appear on a single page before 1969 — seventeen pages in all, 1969 to 2008 — and the name Celestine appears alongside Dragsholm on five pages, the first in 1970. The result holds when the query is varied between the aa and the a spellings. The control in the same corpus is emphatic: Dragsholm and Bothwell share about fifteen hundred pages from 1862 onwards. The Odsherred local-history wiki, independently, gives Holbæk Amts Venstreblad of 28 August 1969 as its source for the legend. Two pointers to the same year. (The measurement is page-level co-occurrence, so it dates the phrase in print, not the belief.) The skeleton is worse than unverified: it is unavailable. Danish media date the find to a repair in 1910; the local-history wiki, following Benzon, says "around 1900" and adds that the bones were reburied in the churchyard without the spot being recorded. That is incompatible with the castle tour's claim that the remains lie behind glass. And the walled-up daughter in love with an enemy officer is a travelling motif: the very magazine feature that tells the Dragsholm version also tells it of Olavinlinna in Finland, where the castellan's daughter Ingel lets in a Russian officer and is bricked up for it. Bothwell's pillar dissolves under the same treatment. Frederik Schiern's monograph of 1863, written from the Danish archives and translated in 1880, is the fullest account there is: in its 163,000 words the string "pillar" occurs zero times, against 1,113 occurrences of Bothwell and 29 of Dragsholm. What Schiern found tradition pointing at, citing an 1847 illustrated survey of Danish manor houses, was "two iron bars in the wall to which the Earl's fetters are said to have been so fastened that he could move round with them" — and he added at once that a critic had repeatedly shown such traditions arose too recently to be believed. The circular groove worn in the floor around a pillar is a later prop. So is the arithmetic: the sentence on English Wikipedia that gives it, and which carries no citation at all, says he was chained there "for the last ten years of his life", but Dragsholm held him four years and ten months. The ten years come from George Buchanan's post decennium of 1582, and they cover the whole Danish captivity. The madness is the point where scepticism has to run the other way. It is not our invention and not modern: Buchanan reported in 1582 that Bothwell died insane, and Melvil, Spottiswood, De Thou, Lord Herries and the anonymous Narratio of 1587 all repeat it. It was contested in 1588, by the Catholic apologist Robert Turner, who needed a lucid deathbed for the confession that exonerated Mary. The reservation worth keeping is that the earliest voice is his bitterest enemy, and that Danish accounts put the insanity before the transfer, as a possible reason for it, not after it as its result. The mummy is the strongest documented thread and our old text had it as hearsay. The coffin was opened on 31 May 1858 "without any positive mark being seen that the corpse found in it was really Bothwell's"; the anatomist Ibsen thought the head had an unmistakable Scottish cast, and Captain Marryat wrote that he defied any impartial Englishman to look at it and not call it an ugly Scotchman. Schiern demolished both in a footnote: a whole series of state prisoners had been held at Dragsholm, and Bothwell was not the only Scotsman buried at Fårevejle — John Clark was there too. In 1938 an expert committee re-examined the burial with X-rays and published in the Sunday supplement of Berlingske Tidende; a letter of 7 November 1938 from Patrick Ramsay of the British legation in Copenhagen, written for King George VI's household, summarised the finding that the mummy was that of a bailiff named Chresten Pedersen Poder who died in 1683, that the crypt post-dated Bothwell by some seventy-five years, and that the coffin's pole fittings dated from about 1700; the director of the National Museum, Poul Nørlund, agreed that the so-called Bothwell burial belongs to the decades around 1700. I have read Ramsay's letter only as quoted in a 2013 study of the case, not in the original file. Danish Wikipedia adds that an analysis showed head and body probably belong to two different men, citing nothing but the word "Skalk" — no issue, no year — and I could not locate it. Finally the commercial incentive, which points the opposite way from what is usually assumed. Dragsholm is repeatedly called one of Europe's most haunted buildings and credited with about a hundred ghosts; neither claim comes from the castle. Its own website in 2001 told the whole history without a single ghost. By 2010 it allowed exactly one, hedged: "it is said that the horse-drawn carriage that carried his coffin away is still heard in the courtyard from time to time!" In 2018 the owner published a signed essay saying that when he took over, the castle was known for ghost stories and bad food, and that "De uopfindsomme spøgelsesfortællinger skulle ud" — the unimaginative ghost tales had to go. As of 2026 the official site's history pages, 707 words in Danish and 849 in English, contain zero occurrences of ghost, spøgelse, haunted, hjemsøgt, hvide dame, grå dame, Bothwell or mummy; the same pages give Adeler six times and 1215 twice, and the timeline names James Hepburn without the title he is famous by. The ghost tour that once ran at 75 kroner for adults and 35 for children has become a historical tour with lunch at 395 kroner. Here the hotel is the sceptic and the visitors are the believers.

Can you visit Dragsholm Castle?

Dragsholm Slot is a working hotel, not a museum: Dragsholm Allé 1, 4534 Hørve, Denmark, telephone +45 59 65 33 00. It has forty-one rooms, three restaurants — a Michelin-starred gourmet room, a bistro and the Herskabsstalden — a cocktail bar, a wine cellar, two vineyards and a shop, and it belongs to Relais & Châteaux. The park around it is the only part you can wander without a booking, and it is where the photograph on this page was taken: the whitewashed baroque south front rebuilt in 1694-97, seen across the lawn. There is no ghost tour on the castle's own programme. Access to the interior is by staying, by eating, or by booking one of the historical guided tours, which appear on the castle's own events calendar for specific dates — 13 and 14 October 2026, for instance, at 395 kroner per person including lunch. Group tours were priced separately in 2019 at 1,500 kroner for one to fifteen guests, 2,500 for fifteen to forty and 3,500 above that, with a two- or three-course lunch at 295 or 375 kroner a head. Book by telephone or through the reception; do not turn up expecting to walk in. The castle chapel, Dragsholm Kirke, shares the castle's address and is a working parish church used for weddings and services, so it is not always open to visitors. The Bothwell material is not at the castle but at Fårevejle Kirke, Fårevejle Kirkevej 35, 4540 Fårevejle, about six kilometres north-east, telephone 59 65 30 42; the parish office is best reached on weekdays. Entry is free and the earl's chapel in the crypt under the side aisle is freely accessible. Expect less than the postcards promise: the body was moved to its present crypt in 1949 and the glass lid was replaced with an oak one on 18 October 1976, so what is on view is the coat of arms, the surviving lid of the original coffin and an information panel. Nobody has looked at a mummy there for half a century. The whole area lies inside the UNESCO-listed Geopark Odsherred; the nearest station is Hørve, on the Odsherred line from Holbæk.

Sources consulted

  1. Frederik Schiern (trans. David Berry), «Life of James Hepburn, Earl of Bothwell» — Thomas and Archibald Constable, Edinburgh (Danish original 1863), 1880 book
  2. Dragsholm Slot, «History of the Castle / Slottets historie» — Official website of Dragsholm Slot, 2026 web
  3. Dragsholm Slot, «Historie (official history page, Internet Archive capture of 13 February 2010)» — Wayback Machine, Internet Archive, 2010 archive
  4. Det Kgl. Bibliotek (Royal Danish Library), «Mediestream newspaper archive: timeline measurements for Dragsholm, Bothwell, den hvide dame, den grå dame and Celestine, 1800-2013» — Mediestream / LabsAPI newspaper corpus, 2026 newspaper archive
  5. Mads Hylleholt Bøttger, «Hvad indad tabes skal udad vindes» — POV International, 2018 newspaper archive
  6. TV 2 Nyheder, «Dragsholms dramatiske historie: Hjemsøgt, besat og brændt» — TV 2 (Denmark), 2014 newspaper archive
  7. Odsherred local-history wiki (odswiki), «Den hvide dame (citing Gorm Benzon and Holbæk Amts Venstreblad, 28 August 1969)» — Odsherred Bibliotek og Kulturhus, 2026 web
  8. Anders Houmøller Thomsen, «8 nordiske spøgelsesslotte» — Historienet.dk, 2021 web
  9. Undine, «Where In the World Is the Earl of Bothwell? (quoting Patrick Ramsay's letter of 7 November 1938 from the British Public Record file)» — Strange Company, 2013 web
  10. Sjællandske Nyheder, «Museums-uhygge i centret: Det er små stykker af Jarlen af Bothwell» — sn.dk, 2019 newspaper archive
  11. DR Nyheder, «Fårevejle vil ikke af med Jarlen af Bothwell» — Danmarks Radio, 2006 newspaper archive
  12. Wikipedia contributors, «James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell (source of the uncited pillar sentence) and James Hepburn, 4. jarl af Bothwell (Danish article citing only 'Skalk')» — Wikipedia, 2026 web

Reviewed by V. Serrano on 2026-08-17 · How we verify our content

Your call, agent: I saw this too 0 Credible 0 Doubtful 0

💬 Field testimonies (0)

No testimonies yet. Add the first.

Add your testimony

🔒 Log in to add a testimony