Aokigahara is a forest of roughly 30 square kilometres on the north-western flank of Mount Fuji, between about 900 and 1,300 metres, straddling the village of Narusawa and the town of Fujikawaguchiko in Yamanashi Prefecture.
Where is Aokigahara?
Location
Yamanashi, Japan
Type
Forest / nature
Coordinates
35.47, 138.62
Last updated
LOCATION
Why is Aokigahara said to be haunted?
It grew on the Aokigahara lava flow, erupted from a fissure on that flank between 864 and 866 CE, which reached Lake Motosu and split an older lake into the two now called Shoji and Sai. It is not the volcano's last eruption: that was Hoei, in 1707. The soil is barely there, leaf litter and humus over bare lava, and the canopy is dominated by hinoki cypress and Tsuga sieboldii rather than the deciduous trees the climate would predict, which is where the name Jukai, sea of trees, comes from. Despite the label primeval, the forest has been worked: the average hinoki is about 113 years old, hinoki was felled here from the Edo period into early Meiji, and charcoal kilns have been found among the trees. Aokigahara is prefectural forest and the strictest class of protected zone in Fuji-Hakone-Izu National Park; leaving the marked boardwalks is prohibited. Since 2008 the municipalities, the prefecture and local businesses have run a daily outreach and support programme in the forest.
Aokigahara begins as an accident of drainage. In June of the year 864 a fissure 5.7 km long opened on the north-western flank of Mount Fuji and went on erupting for more than two years. The Japan Meteorological Agency's chronology of Fuji's historical activity records the outcome flatly: lava flowed from near Nagaoyama, the arm running north-west reached Lake Motosu and split the old lake called Se-no-umi into the two now named Shōji and Sai, and houses were buried. The Geological Survey of Japan puts the Jōgan eruption at AD 864–866 and gives its output as roughly 1.3–1.5 km³ of magma.
What grew back sits on that rock and behaves accordingly. Yamanashi Prefecture's own eco-tour guideline defines the area as "roughly 30 square kilometres of so-called primeval forest spreading over the Aokigahara lava flow", between about 900 and 1,300 m, straddling the village of Narusawa and the town of Fujikawaguchiko. A permanent study plot run by ecologists from Ibaraki University found the soil almost nonexistent — leaf litter and humus over bare lava, with almost no horizon structure — and the canopy dominated not by the deciduous trees the regional climate should produce but by hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa), 45.4 % of basal area, and Tsuga sieboldii, 26.3 %.
Which brings up the thing least often said about Aokigahara: it is not untouched. The same study cites Kiyofuji's 1991 age survey, in which the oldest hinoki was about 240 years and the average only 113, and historical documents showing hinoki were felled here from the Edo period into early Meiji. Tsuga, useless as timber, was mostly left — which is why tsuga over 300 years old survive and hinoki does not. And the remains of charcoal kilns have been found inside the forest: broadleaves were burnt to charcoal on the spot and carried out, a use that continued widely until recent decades. The two municipalities put it in one line of their own handbook: "in the past it was a forest that supported the lives of local people."
Nor is it national forest, as is usually assumed: Aokigahara is Yamanashi prefectural forest, part of the onshirin estate granted to the prefecture in 1911, and it heads the Ministry of the Environment's table of Special Protection Zones for Fuji-Hakone-Izu National Park at 1,225 hectares, every parcel publicly owned. It had been a National Natural Monument since February 1926, well before the park itself.
The dark reputation is the newest layer, and the one where the sources stop agreeing. It is routinely traced to a Seichō Matsumoto novel, but two different novels get the credit and neither attribution survives the record. Nami no Tō ("Tower of Waves") was serialised in Josei Jishin and published by Kobunsha in 1960, the year under which the National Diet Library catalogue holds that edition. Kuroi Jukai — literally "black sea of trees", which is presumably why it gets swept in — was published by Kodansha, also in 1960, and Kodansha's own synopsis places it at a bus crash near Hamamatsu and inside a newspaper office. It has nothing to do with Fuji. Bungeishunju's current edition of Nami no Tō summarises the plot as a doomed affair between a young prosecutor and the wife of a man implicated in a ministry corruption case, and never mentions the forest.
Against that, the two local governments date the change themselves, and not to 1960. Their handbook says the forest "became famous as a place of suicide from the Shōwa 40s" — that is, 1965–1974, a decade or more after either book. By 1988 a psychiatrist at Yamanashi Medical College, Yoshitomo Takahashi, could open a paper in Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior by stating the association as established background. In July 1993 Ohta Books published Wataru Tsurumi's Kanzen Jisatsu Manyuaru, 198 pages, still advertised by the publisher in its own words as "a suicide device made of words"; between 1999 and 2023 at least five prefectures — Kanagawa first, on 22 October 1999 — designated it a publication harmful to young people.
What is documented in detail is the response. In June 2008 the municipalities, local businesses and the prefecture formed the Inochi wo Tsunagu Aokigahara Network Conference, chaired by the mayor of Fujikawaguchiko. Its outreach programme, catalogued by Japan's national suicide-prevention centre, puts two teams of two paid staff on patrol every day of the year, roughly 09:00 to 17:00, around the caves, car parks and boardwalks, backed by shopkeepers, the bus and taxi companies, a drug-rehabilitation NPO on night rounds, a police box in the summer holidays and, since FY2024, drones after dark. The published results are counted in people helped: 346 approached and 48 taken into protection in FY2020; 2,359 approached and 525 taken into protection between FY2012 and FY2019 — at zero cost to the municipalities.
The other half of the answer is about narrative. Yamanashi's Third Suicide Prevention Plan (2024–2028) commits two named departments in writing: forestry policy "will dispel the image of a 'famous suicide spot', including by not permitting the use of prefectural land such as Aokigahara Jukai for the filming of films or television programmes that risk encouraging suicide", and tourism confirms the prefectural film commission will not support such shoots. The prefecture's own 2025 booklet is titled The Truth About Aokigahara Jukai: moss, lava caves, guides and food, in which the word "suicide" does not appear once.
Timeline: the documented record of Aokigahara
864–866 — the Jōgan eruptionA fissure 5.7 km long opens on Mount Fuji's north-western flank and erupts for more than two years. Lava from near Nagaoyama reaches Lake Motosu, splits the old lake Se-no-umi into Shōji and Sai, buries houses and kills the lake's fish. Total output is estimated at roughly 1.3 to 1.5 km3 of magma.
1911 — the forest changes handsThe imperial forest estate is granted to Yamanashi Prefecture and becomes the onshirin, some 158,000 hectares covering about 35 % of the prefecture. Aokigahara is prefectural forest, not national forest, and entry permits are issued by the prefecture to this day.
24 February 1926The forest is designated a National Natural Monument. The lava caves and lava tree moulds of the same flow follow on 17 December 1929. The state's interest in this place was geological and botanical long before it was anything else.
1 February 1936Fuji-Hakone National Park is designated, later renamed Fuji-Hakone-Izu. Aokigahara is listed first in the park's table of Special Protection Zones, 1,225 hectares, every parcel of it publicly owned, with a contiguous Class-1 Special Zone of 1,311 hectares alongside.
1943 — the lava that founded a disciplineTakesi Nagata publishes his rock-magnetism study of the Aokigahara lava, showing that a lava's magnetisation survives sampling and can be read as a record of the ancient geomagnetic field. A later Shizuoka University report calls it the moment the curtain rose on modern palaeomagnetism.
1960 — the two novelsBoth novels routinely blamed for the forest's reputation are published this year, not in 1961: Nami no To by Kobunsha and Kuroi Jukai by Kodansha. Kodansha's own synopsis places Kuroi Jukai at a bus crash near Hamamatsu, with no connection to Mount Fuji.
The Showa 40s (1965-1974)The two municipalities that contain the forest date the change themselves, in their own handbook: in the past it was a forest that supported the lives of local people, but from the Showa 40s it became famous as a place of suicide. That is a decade or more after either novel.
1988Yoshitomo Takahashi, a psychiatrist at Yamanashi Medical College, opens a paper in Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior by stating the association as established background.
July 1993Ohta Books publishes Wataru Tsurumi's Kanzen Jisatsu Manyuaru, 198 pages, advertised by the publisher in its own words as a suicide device made of words.
22 October 1999Kanagawa Prefecture formally designates the book a publication harmful to young people. It is the earliest such designation traceable in an official record; at least five prefectures did the same between 1999 and 2023.
June 2008The surrounding municipalities, local businesses and the prefecture form the Aokigahara Network Conference, chaired by the mayor of Fujikawaguchiko. Its outreach programme puts two teams of two on patrol every day of the year and reports 2,359 people approached and 525 taken into protection between FY2012 and FY2019.
July 2013 to April 2014The Yamanashi Nichinichi Shimbun runs 43 instalments in seven parts on the forest. Its desk chief describes the aim as overwriting the prevailing image with that of a beautiful and powerful forest of life.
2024-2028Yamanashi's Third Suicide Prevention Plan commits the forestry division to refusing the use of prefectural land such as Aokigahara for filming that risks encouraging suicide, and the tourism division to withholding film-commission support. The same plan records that about 30 % of the people found in the prefecture lived elsewhere, and sets a target for reducing that number.
Is there a rational explanation for Aokigahara?
Four common assertions about Aokigahara are taken in turn below, followed by a note on this page.
"Compasses don't work in Aokigahara." Two official documents that describe the forest in detail say nothing of the kind. The explanatory notes to the Geological Survey of Japan's 2016 geological map of Fuji describe the Aokigahara lava and the fissure that fed it without once using the character 磁, "magnetism". Yamanashi Prefecture's 2025 booklet The Truth About Aokigahara Jukai names the forest nineteen times, and the character for "magnetism" does not occur in it once.
There is a real fact underneath, and it is better than the legend. Rock magnetism on Fuji is genuinely strong and stable — so much so that Takesi Nagata used the Aokigahara lava in 1943 to show that a lava's magnetisation survives sampling and can be read as a record of the ancient geomagnetic field, a paper a 1997 Shizuoka University report calls the moment "the curtain rose on modern palaeomagnetism". The same report describes what that means in the field: some Fuji lavas are magnetised strongly enough to disturb a bearing taken with a clinometer, so the geologists ran kite string out to a point well clear of the rock and used the distant reading whenever the near one was affected. That is the whole phenomenon. An instrument resting on magnetised basalt reads the basalt; held well away from the rock, it reads the Earth's field. People do get lost here — but the prefecture's own explanation is a lava floor pitted with holes hidden under fallen leaves, which is why stepping off the boardwalk is prohibited outright.
"An untouched primeval forest." The tourist literature says genseirin; the ecology says otherwise. Age surveys found the oldest hinoki about 240 years old and the mean only 113, documents record hinoki cut from Edo into early Meiji, and charcoal kilns have been found among the trees. The ecologists suggest this human disturbance is part of why oak is scarce and conifers dominate a site whose climate should produce deciduous forest. Aokigahara is about 1,160 years old as a lava surface and rather less than 250 in most of its standing timber.
"A 1961 novel made it the suicide forest." The bibliography settles the first half: both candidate novels appeared in 1960, Nami no Tō from Kobunsha and Kuroi Jukai from Kodansha, and Kodansha's own synopsis sets Kuroi Jukai around a bus crash near Hamamatsu, with no connection to Fuji; its title is presumably what drags it in. The larger problem is the date of the reputation itself. The two municipalities that contain the forest say in their own handbook that it became known as a place of suicide "from the Shōwa 40s", 1965–1974 — a decade or more after either book. The World Health Organization's guidance for reporters says "Don't oversimplify the reason for a suicide or reduce it to a single factor", and the single-novel story also fails on the calendar. What can be said is narrower: by 1988 the association was established enough for a Yamanashi psychiatrist to state it as background in a peer-reviewed journal.
The figures. Japan counts suicides two ways, and Yamanashi's own plan sets out the difference: the National Police Agency's statistics record a death where the body was found, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's vital statistics where the person lived. For Yamanashi the two give very different results. On the residence basis the prefecture's 2022 rate per 100,000 was 16.8; on the discovery basis it was 24.8, the highest in Japan. The prefecture's own plan explains the gap without euphemism: in 2022, of the people found in Yamanashi, 137 lived there and 62 — about 30 % — came from outside or could not be identified. Yamanashi consequently sets two separate targets, one of which is to reduce the number of people who cross a prefectural boundary to die inside it. The plan gives its figures for the prefecture and for its health regions, and notes that the gap between the two bases is most marked in Fuji-Tōbu, the region that contains the forest. It names Aokigahara only in its list of measures, among them police patrols, a mobile police box and the refusal of filming on prefectural land, and gives no figure for the forest itself.
And a note on what this page does. The WHO's 2023 quick reference guide for media professionals lists among its Don'ts "Don't name or provide details about the site/location", "Don't describe the method used" and "Don't use photographs, video footage, audio recordings, or digital or social media links", and among its Dos "Do provide accurate information about where and how to seek help for suicidal thoughts and suicidal crises". An entry about a named place cannot honour the first and remain an entry about that place. It can honour the rest — which is why this file prints no method, no death count for the forest and no personal case.
Can you visit Aokigahara?
Aokigahara is public forest and visiting it is an ordinary thing to do. It is also the first entry in the Special Protection Zone table of Fuji-Hakone-Izu National Park — 1,225 hectares, wholly public land, alongside a contiguous 1,311-hectare Class-1 zone — and a National Natural Monument, so the rules are firmer than for most walks. The park was designated on 1 February 1936.
The rule about routes is a prohibition with its reasons printed beside it. The prefecture's own visitor booklet gives two reasons in one sentence: "there is a danger of catching your foot in lava holes hidden by fallen leaves and falling", and "from the standpoint of environmental protection, leaving the trail and entering is prohibited". The official eco-tour guideline, in force since 2004, tells participants to "never leave the routes designated in these guidelines" and then names them: the Shōji-guchi trail, the maintained boardwalks including the Tōkai Nature Trail, and the forest roads. It caps groups at 20-25 people with about one guide per ten, asks walkers to go single file, and bans marking trees with tape or paint outright. Anything beyond those routes requires a permit from the prefecture's Fuji-Tōbu forestry office. Also posted: no fires, no collecting plants, no damage to moss or rock.
The two show caves are lava tubes of the same flow, and their operator published all of this on 22 September 2026. Fugaku Wind Cave runs 201 m with a ceiling up to 8.7 m, averages 3 °C, and takes about fifteen minutes to walk; its basalt walls absorb sound, so the interior does not echo. Narusawa Ice Cave runs 153 m, is 1.5 to 11 m wide and 1 to 3.6 m high, averages the same 3 °C, and loops, so the circuit closes on itself in six or seven minutes. Admission at both is ¥350 for adults and ¥200 for children of primary-school age and under, dropping to ¥250 and ¥100 for groups of fifteen or more, with school rates of ¥200 for secondary pupils and ¥100 for primary. Opening is at 9:00 all year; closing moves in six steps — 17:30 from 1 August to 15 October, 17:00 to 15 November, 16:30 to 15 February, 16:00 to 28 February, 16:30 to 15 March, 17:00 to 31 July — under the operator's own caveat that hours change with the weather and the state of the caves. Car parks hold 150 cars and 10 coaches at the wind cave, 100 and 10 at the ice cave. The ice cave sits at the eastern entrance of Aokigahara and was declared a natural monument by the Ministry of Education in 1929; the wind cave stored silkworm eggs as a natural refrigerator until the early Shōwa years. Addresses and telephones are published: 〒401-0332 Yamanashi, Minamitsuru-gun, Fujikawaguchiko-machi, Saiko Aokigahara 2068-1, 0555-85-2300; and 〒401-0320 Yamanashi, Minamitsuru-gun, Narusawa-mura 8533, 0555-85-2301.
Getting there is thirty minutes by local bus from Kawaguchiko Station, alighting at the Fūketsu or Hyōketsu stops, or twenty minutes by car from the Kawaguchiko interchange on the Chūō Expressway. A two-day Retro Bus pass covers the Kawaguchiko and Saiko-Aokigahara loops.
A point of World Heritage bookkeeping: Mount Fuji was inscribed in 2013 with 25 constituent assets, and the two famous caves are not among them. What is inscribed nearby are the three lakes this flow made or bounded — Sai, Shōji and Motosu, assets 1-7 to 1-9 — and the Funatsu and Yoshida lava tree moulds, assets 21 and 22.
One activity is refused outright. Yamanashi Prefecture does not permit entry for the purpose of filming films, television programmes or streamed video that risk encouraging suicide, and the prefectural film commission will not support such shoots on prefectural land. That is standing written policy, published in the local network conference's handbook and restated in the prefectural plan for 2024-2028.
The forest is also worked, every day, by people whose job is to talk to whoever seems to need it. The Aokigahara ふれあい声かけ事業 puts two pairs of dedicated municipal staff on patrol by car and on foot, roughly 09:00 to 17:00, on a 365-day rota across Narusawa and Fujikawaguchiko; nearby shops pass on what they notice. The published results: 346 people approached and 48 protected in the 2020 financial year, and 2,359 approached and 525 protected across 2012 to 2019. The programme costs the two municipalities nothing, being carried by the national grant for local suicide countermeasures, and its contacts are printed in the case file: Narusawa's welfare and health section on 0555-85-3081, Fujikawaguchiko's welfare promotion section on 0555-72-6028. The network conference behind it was founded in June 2008 and is chaired by the mayor of Fujikawaguchiko.
The lines those teams hand out, together with the Spanish one, were checked against their operators' own pages on 22 September 2026.
Spain — 024. The Ministry of Health describes it as "un servicio de alcance nacional (accesible desde todo el territorio nacional), gratuito, confidencial y disponible las 24 horas del día, los 365 días del año", whose users are "las personas con conducta o ideación suicida, así como los familiares o allegados de víctimas de suicidio o de personas con ideación suicida". There is an online chat run with the Red Cross and access in sign language by video interpretation.
Japan — #いのちSOS, 0120-061-338, listed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as free and open 24 hours, 365 days. The same ministry lists the Kokoro no Kenkō Sōdan Tōitsu Daiyaru on 0570-064-556, whose hours vary by prefecture and which carries a call charge.
Japan, in English — TELL Lifeline, 0800-300-8355, toll free. TELL puts it plainly: "Whoever you are, whatever you are going through, if you are living in Japan our trained Lifeline Support Workers are here for you." Phone hours run continuously from Saturday 09:00 to Monday 23:00, then 09:00-23:00 Tuesday to Thursday and 09:00-02:00 on Friday; the chat service opens daily at 16:00.
💬 Field testimonies (0)
No testimonies yet. Add the first.
Add your testimony
🔒 Log in to add a testimony